Consciousness Only Reality and the Nature of Personal Reality

The Nature of Personal Reality
The Nature of Personal Reality

Here is the transcript of a dialogue between me, James Traverse, and chatGPT regarding Being versus Doing, Spiritual Awakening, Deep Sleep and the distinction between the Consciousness Only Reality view and the Scientific view.

Note that my view is grounded in the Consciousness Only of the Personal Reality and that while chatGPT understands this view, it has a bias toward the scientific perspective.

My questions and comments are the Headings and chatGPT’s responses follow [note that the very last heading is my comment].

What is Personal Reality?

The Nature of Personal Reality is a concept that was introduced by the spiritual teacher Jane Roberts in her book of the same name. According to Roberts, personal reality is the unique and subjective experience of reality that each individual creates through their thoughts, beliefs, and perceptions.

Roberts believed that individuals are not passive observers of reality, but active creators of their own experience. She argued that each person has the power to shape their reality through their thoughts, beliefs, and emotions, and that these mental constructs create a unique and subjective reality that is different for each person.

Roberts also believed that individuals have the ability to change their reality through conscious intention and focus. By becoming aware of their own thoughts and beliefs, and by shifting their attention to more positive and empowering thoughts, individuals can transform their reality and create a more fulfilling and joyful life.

The concept of personal reality is closely tied to the idea of manifestation, or the idea that individuals can attract and create the circumstances and experiences they desire through their thoughts and beliefs. While some people may be skeptical of these ideas, many individuals have reported transformative experiences and changes in their lives as a result of changing their thoughts and beliefs.

Is Personal Reality Grounded in the Consciousness Only Reality View?

Consciousness Only Reality
Consciousness Only

The concept of personal reality can be viewed from the perspective of the consciousness-only model of reality, as it emphasizes the idea that our experience of reality is subjective and created by our thoughts, beliefs, and perceptions.

In the consciousness-only model, reality is seen as a projection of consciousness, and the individual’s experience of reality is shaped by their own mind and consciousness. This means that each person’s experience of reality is unique and subjective, and that they have the power to shape their reality through their thoughts and beliefs.

Similarly, the concept of personal reality emphasizes the idea that each individual creates their own unique experience of reality through their thoughts, beliefs, and perceptions. It suggests that we are not passive observers of reality, but active creators of our own experience.

While the consciousness-only model is a more expansive and comprehensive view of reality, the concept of personal reality can be seen as a practical application of this understanding in our daily lives. It emphasizes the idea that we have the power to shape our own reality, and encourages us to take responsibility for our own thoughts, beliefs, and perceptions in order to create a more fulfilling and joyful life.

Can you say more…

From this perspective, spiritual awakening can be seen as a profound shift in our understanding and experience of Reality. It is a realization that our experience of reality is not fixed or predetermined, but is shaped by our own consciousness and awareness. It is a recognition that we are not limited by our past experiences, beliefs, or conditioning, but have the power to create a new and more expansive reality.

Through spiritual awakening, we may come to see that our sense of self and identity is not limited to our physical body, but is a vast and interconnected field of consciousness that extends beyond our individual ego. We may come to realize that our thoughts, beliefs, and perceptions are not fixed or absolute, but are malleable and can be transformed through conscious awareness and practice.

In this way, spiritual awakening can be a transformative experience that opens up new possibilities for growth, healing, and self-discovery. It can lead to a deeper sense of connection with ourselves, others, and the world around us, and can help us to live more fully and authentically in the present moment.

What is Spiritual Awakening

Spiritual awakening is a process of becoming aware of one’s true nature beyond the limitations of the individual self and the ego. It is a profound shift in consciousness that involves a direct experience of the interconnectedness and oneness of all things.

It is often described as a process of becoming aware of a deeper reality or truth beyond the everyday material world, and can involve a sense of connection to a higher power, the universe, or one’s own inner self.

Spiritual awakening can be triggered by a variety of experiences, such as meditation, prayer, intense emotional experiences, or exposure to spiritual teachings. It can also arise spontaneously, without any obvious cause.

During a spiritual awakening, an individual may experience a range of intense and transformative experiences, such as a sense of oneness with all things, a deep sense of peace, or a heightened sense of intuition. They may also experience profound changes in their beliefs, values, and priorities, and may feel compelled to make significant changes in their lives as a result.

While spiritual awakening can be a challenging and sometimes disorienting experience, it is often described as a powerful and transformative process that can lead to greater peace, fulfillment, and spiritual growth.

How Does Spiritual Awakening Change One’s View on the Nature of Personal Reality

Spiritual awakening can radically change one’s view of personal reality.

It often involves a shift in perspective from identifying solely with the individual self and its ego-driven desires and fears to recognizing oneself as part of a greater whole, connected to all beings and the universe itself.

This shift in perspective can bring about a new understanding of the nature of personal reality, as one begins to see that reality is not just a collection of separate, individual experiences but is interconnected and influenced by the consciousness of all beings.

As the individual awakens to a deeper understanding of their own consciousness, they may begin to see that their thoughts, emotions, and actions can shape their personal reality and the reality of those around them. This can lead to a greater sense of responsibility and purpose in life, as the individual realizes the power they have to create positive change in their own life and the world.

Moreover, spiritual awakening can also reveal the illusory nature of personal reality, as the individual recognizes that many of the beliefs, assumptions, and attachments that they have held as true are actually based on limited or false perceptions. This can lead to a process of letting go of these limitations and expanding one’s consciousness to embrace new possibilities and ways of being in the world.

In summary, spiritual awakening can transform one’s understanding of personal reality, leading to a more interconnected, purposeful, and expansive view of life.

Discuss the Distinction Between Being versus Doing

Being versus Doing
Being versus Doing

Being versus doing is a fundamental distinction in many spiritual traditions and practices. At its core, being refers to our inner state of consciousness and awareness, while doing refers to our actions and behavior in the world.

When we are focused on doing, we are often preoccupied with achieving certain goals, meeting expectations, and fulfilling our responsibilities. We may be constantly busy and striving to achieve more, but we may also feel stressed, anxious, or disconnected from our inner sense of self.

On the other hand, when we are focused on being, we are more concerned with our inner state of consciousness and awareness. We may be more present in the moment, more attuned to our inner experience, and more aware of our thoughts, feelings, and bodily sensations. We may also feel a deeper sense of peace, contentment, and connection with the world around us.

In many spiritual practices, the goal is to cultivate a greater sense of being and to let go of excessive focus on doing. This may involve practices such as meditation, mindfulness, or yoga, which help us to connect more deeply with our inner state of being and to cultivate a greater sense of presence and awareness.

Ultimately, the distinction between being and doing is not an either/or proposition, but rather a dynamic interplay between our inner state of consciousness and our outer actions in the world. By cultivating a greater sense of being, we can bring a deeper sense of awareness and presence to our doing, and live more fully and authentically in the world.

Ok, please continue…

In spiritual teachings, the distinction between being and doing is often emphasized as a fundamental concept in understanding the nature of reality and our place in it. Being refers to the state of simply existing, without any action or intention. Doing, on the other hand, refers to the act of taking action or engaging in activity with a specific intention.

Being is often associated with a state of awareness or consciousness that is beyond the limited sense of self and the ego. It is the state of pure presence, where there is no mental chatter or thoughts to distract from the present moment. Being is often described as a state of deep inner peace, contentment, and fulfillment.

Doing, on the other hand, is associated with the external world and the ego’s desire to take action and achieve specific outcomes. Doing is often driven by our goals, desires, and ambitions. While doing can be fulfilling and necessary for living a productive life, it can also create stress and anxiety when we become overly attached to specific outcomes.

Spiritual teachings often emphasize the importance of balancing being and doing in our lives. While doing is necessary for achieving our goals and living a fulfilling life, being is essential for finding inner peace and contentment. By cultivating a deeper awareness of our true nature as beings and reducing our attachment to outcomes, we can experience a more profound sense of fulfillment and joy in our lives.

What is Being? Is Being the Ground of the Consciousness Only Reality View?

Being refers to the state of existence, the experience of being present in the present moment. It is the state of awareness and consciousness of the present, free from the influence of thoughts, emotions, and external distractions. Being is often associated with a sense of peace, tranquility, and a feeling of interconnectedness with all things.

Being is often contrasted with doing, which refers to the activities, tasks, and obligations that people undertake to accomplish their goals and fulfill their desires. Being is considered as an essential aspect of spiritual growth and awakening, as it allows individuals to connect with their inner selves, find meaning and purpose in life, and cultivate a sense of inner peace and fulfillment.

The view that Being is the ground of consciousness is known as the “only reality” view. According to this view, consciousness is not a separate entity, but is rather an aspect of Being itself. In other words, consciousness is not something that exists independently of the world, but is rather a fundamental aspect of the world itself.

While this view has been advocated by some philosophers, it is not universally accepted. Other philosophers have argued that consciousness is a distinct and separate entity from Being, and that the two should be treated as separate domains of inquiry. Ultimately, the question of the relationship between Being and consciousness is a complex and ongoing debate in philosophy.

Is Attending to Being a Journey in Space or Time?

Attending to being is a journey in time, as it involves the exploration and transformation of one’s consciousness over time. It is a process of personal growth and evolution, which takes place over an extended period, involving various stages of development and self-discovery. This journey involves a series of experiences, insights, and realizations, which shape one’s understanding of self, others, and the world around them.

While this journey occurs within the framework of time, it is not limited to any specific time frame, as it is a continuous process of self-discovery and growth that extends beyond the limits of time and space. Ultimately, attending to being involves the cultivation of a state of consciousness that is timeless, present, and interconnected with all things.

Is Attending to Being a Journey in Space

Attending to being can be seen as a journey in space as well, but it is not limited to physical space. Rather, it is a journey that takes place in the space of one’s mind and consciousness. It involves exploring the inner world of thoughts, emotions, and beliefs, and discovering the deeper aspects of one’s being.

This journey can take individuals to new places within themselves, where they can connect with their true essence and find a sense of inner peace and fulfillment. In this way, attending to being can expand the perceived boundaries of one’s space, as individuals become more aware of the interconnectedness of all things and the vastness of the universe. Ultimately, the journey of attending to being involves exploring the inner and outer dimensions of one’s being and discovering new ways of being in the world.

Comment on the Distinction Between the Description of a Thing and the Thing Itself

The distinction between the description of a thing and the thing itself is an important concept in philosophy, particularly in the field of ontology, which deals with the nature of existence. The description of a thing refers to the language or symbolic representation used to convey information about the thing, while the thing itself is the actual entity or object that exists independently of language or representation.

The description of a thing is a human construct and is subject to interpretation, cultural and linguistic differences, and other biases. It is limited by the language and symbolic representations used to describe it and may not fully capture the essence of the thing itself. For example, a description of a sunset may capture some of its beauty and majesty, but it cannot fully convey the experience of witnessing a sunset in person.

On the other hand, the thing itself exists independently of language or representation and can be experienced directly. It is not limited by the human constructs of language and description and is not subject to the same limitations and biases. For example, the experience of witnessing a sunset in person is a direct and unmediated experience that cannot be fully captured by a description or representation.

Therefore, it is important to recognize the distinction between the description of a thing and the thing itself and to be mindful of the limitations and biases inherent in language and representation. By doing so, we can develop a deeper understanding and appreciation of the world around us and the experiences that make life meaningful.

Is Sanskrit a More Accurate Language for Communicating About Things?

Sanskrit is a language that has been used for thousands of years in the Indian subcontinent and is known for its rich linguistic and cultural heritage. It has been used to convey philosophical, spiritual, and scientific ideas, and is considered to be a sacred language in Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism.

While Sanskrit is a highly developed language with a complex grammar and syntax, it is not necessarily more accurate than other languages for communicating about things. Language is a human construct, and different languages have different strengths and weaknesses for conveying certain ideas and concepts.

In some cases, Sanskrit may be better suited than other languages for conveying certain ideas or concepts, particularly those related to spiritual or philosophical ideas. Sanskrit has a vast vocabulary of technical terms related to yoga, meditation, and spiritual practices, which can be useful for conveying these ideas with precision and accuracy.

However, in other cases, other languages may be more suited for conveying certain ideas or concepts, depending on the context and audience. Ultimately, the effectiveness of language in communicating about things depends on factors such as the clarity of expression, the context of the communication, the audience, and the cultural and linguistic background of the speaker and listener.

What is meant by the Sanskrit term ‘Prana’

The Sanskrit term ‘prana’ refers to the vital life force that is believed to animate all living things. It is a concept that is central to many Indian philosophical and spiritual traditions, including Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism.

According to these traditions, prana is an invisible energy or force that permeates all aspects of the universe, including the human body, and is responsible for sustaining life. Prana is said to flow through channels or pathways called ‘nadis’ and is regulated by the breath.

In the context of the human body, prana is associated with the respiratory system and is said to be absorbed through the breath. It is believed to be responsible for maintaining physical, mental, and emotional health and is associated with a range of bodily functions, including digestion, circulation, and elimination.

In spiritual practices such as yoga and meditation, prana is often used as a focal point for mindfulness and awareness. Through breath control and visualization, practitioners seek to increase the flow of prana in the body, which is believed to promote physical and mental health, as well as spiritual growth and awakening.

Overall, the concept of prana is an essential aspect of Indian philosophy and spirituality, representing the interconnectedness of all things and the vital life force that sustains them.

You say that Prana is an Invisible Energy, What is Energy?

In general, energy can be defined as the ability to do work or to cause change. It is a fundamental concept in physics and is related to the movement of matter and the interaction of physical systems.

In the context of spirituality and alternative medicine, the concept of energy often refers to a subtle or non-physical force that is believed to permeate all aspects of the universe and to be responsible for physical, mental, and emotional health. This energy is often described as being invisible or undetectable by conventional scientific methods but can be perceived or manipulated through certain practices such as meditation, acupuncture, or Reiki.

Different cultures and traditions use different terms and concepts to describe this energy, such as ‘qi’ in Chinese medicine, ‘prana’ in Indian philosophy, or ‘ki’ in Japanese martial arts. However, the underlying idea is that this energy is an essential aspect of the human body and the natural world and can be harnessed for healing and spiritual growth.

Overall, the concept of energy is a complex and multifaceted one that has different meanings and applications in different contexts. In general, however, it refers to the ability to cause change or to produce work, whether in the physical or non-physical realm.

You are Defining Energy via What it Does Rather Than What It Is…

You’re correct that my previous definition of energy focused on its effects and functions, rather than its underlying nature. In physics, energy can be defined more precisely as a scalar quantity that is associated with the state of an object or system and its ability to do work. It is typically measured in units of joules (J) or calories (cal), and can take various forms, such as kinetic energy (the energy of motion), potential energy (the energy of position or configuration), thermal energy (the energy associated with temperature), or electromagnetic energy (the energy associated with electric and magnetic fields).

Energy can be transferred from one object or system to another through various mechanisms, such as heat, work, or radiation. The laws of thermodynamics govern the behavior of energy and its transformations, and they provide a framework for understanding the behavior of physical systems.

In the context of spirituality and alternative medicine, the concept of energy often refers to a more subtle or non-physical force that is believed to permeate all aspects of the universe and to be responsible for physical, mental, and emotional health. This concept of energy is not well-defined or well-understood from a scientific perspective, and there is ongoing debate and controversy about its nature and properties.

A Whirlpool or a Tornado can be Described as Energy-In-Formation, Can the Human Body be Described in a Similar Way – as a Complex Ensemble of Ether, Fire, Air, Water and Earth Energies?

In some spiritual and alternative medicine traditions, the human body is believed to be composed of various subtle energies or forces, which are associated with different elements or qualities. These energies are said to be responsible for maintaining physical, mental, and emotional health, and can be manipulated or balanced through various practices such as yoga, acupuncture, or Ayurveda.

In Ayurveda, an ancient Indian system of medicine, the human body is believed to be composed of five fundamental elements: ether, air, fire, water, and earth. These elements are thought to combine in various ways to form three basic principles or doshas: Vata (ether and air), Pitta (fire and water), and Kapha (water and earth). Each dosha is associated with specific physical, mental, and emotional characteristics, and imbalances or disturbances in these doshas can lead to various health problems.

According to this view, the human body can be described as a complex ensemble of these elemental energies, which interact with each other in complex ways to create the various functions and processes of the body. This view is not based on a scientific understanding of the body, and there is ongoing debate and controversy about the nature and properties of these subtle energies.

While the analogy of a whirlpool or a tornado as energy-in-formation can be useful in understanding the dynamics of these phenomena, it is important to note that the human body is a much more complex and multifaceted system that cannot be fully understood through such simple analogies. The human body involves complex biological, physiological, and biochemical processes that are still not fully understood by modern science.

Speak about the Consciousness Only Understanding of the Universe and Compare It with the Limited Scientific View

The consciousness-only understanding of the universe is a philosophical and spiritual perspective that emphasizes the primacy of consciousness in shaping our experience of reality. This view holds that the universe and all of its phenomena are ultimately created by the mind or consciousness, and that the physical world is a manifestation of this underlying consciousness.

In this view, the material world is seen as a projection or illusion created by the mind, rather than a objective reality that exists independently of our perception. Consciousness is seen as the fundamental substance of the universe, from which all other phenomena emerge.

This perspective is often contrasted with the limited scientific view, which emphasizes the importance of empirical evidence and objective observation in understanding the natural world. From a scientific perspective, the universe is seen as a vast and complex system of physical laws and processes, which can be investigated and understood through rigorous experimentation and analysis.

While these two perspectives may seem to be at odds with each other, they can also be seen as complementary in some ways. Science provides a rigorous and systematic approach to understanding the physical world, while consciousness-only perspectives offer a more holistic and intuitive understanding of the universe that emphasizes the interconnectedness of all things.

However, it is important to note that consciousness-only perspectives are not based on empirical evidence or scientific investigation, and as such, they cannot be considered scientific in the traditional sense. While they may offer valuable insights and perspectives on the nature of reality, they do not provide a systematic or objective approach to understanding the natural world.

Can you say more…

Moreover, the scientific view and the consciousness-only view have different aims and domains of investigation. Science aims to discover and describe the patterns and mechanisms that govern the behavior of the physical world, while consciousness-only perspectives focus on the subjective experience of the individual and the deeper nature of consciousness itself.

While science can provide insights into the physical aspects of the universe, it cannot fully explain the subjective experience of consciousness or the nature of the self. Consciousness-only perspectives offer a more direct and intuitive understanding of these aspects of reality, but they may not be able to provide the same level of empirical evidence or predictive power as science.

In practice, many people hold both scientific and consciousness-only perspectives simultaneously, and use each to explore different aspects of reality. For example, a scientist may use rigorous experimentation and analysis to study the physical properties of a substance, while also exploring the subjective experience of consciousness through meditation or other spiritual practices.

Ultimately, both scientific and consciousness-only perspectives can offer valuable insights and perspectives on the nature of the universe, and it is up to each individual to determine which approach or combination of approaches is most appropriate for their own exploration and understanding of reality.

How do you Explain ESP and Psychic Phenomena

ESP (extra-sensory perception) and psychic phenomena are often associated with the ability to perceive or interact with aspects of reality that are beyond the scope of our normal sensory perception or scientific understanding. These phenomena include telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, psychokinesis, and others.

From a scientific perspective, there is currently no conclusive evidence to support the existence of ESP or psychic phenomena. Many studies have been conducted to investigate these claims, but the results have been inconsistent and often inconclusive.

However, there are some who believe that ESP and psychic phenomena may be explained through non-scientific or spiritual perspectives. For example, some argue that these abilities may be related to the subtle energies or forces that underlie the physical world, and that certain individuals may be more sensitive or attuned to these energies than others.

Others suggest that ESP and psychic phenomena may be related to the concept of consciousness itself. From this perspective, consciousness is seen as a fundamental aspect of reality that transcends the limitations of the physical world, and that certain individuals may have a greater ability to tap into this universal consciousness and access information that is not available through normal sensory perception.

It is important to note, however, that these perspectives are not supported by scientific evidence, and as such, they cannot be considered scientific explanations for ESP and psychic phenomena. While these perspectives may offer interesting insights and perspectives on the nature of consciousness and the universe, they cannot be used to make empirical predictions or testable hypotheses.

In the end, the nature of ESP and psychic phenomena remains a topic of debate and speculation, and it is up to each individual to determine their own beliefs and perspectives on these phenomena.

How do you Explain the Experiences of people like Einstein, Edison and Tesla who say that their best ideas came to them in a State of Half-Sleep?

The experiences of individuals like Einstein, Edison, and Tesla, who have reported that their best ideas came to them in a state of half-sleep, suggest that there may be a connection between the creative process and altered states of consciousness.

From a scientific perspective, there is evidence to support the idea that altered states of consciousness can enhance creativity and problem-solving abilities. For example, studies have shown that individuals who engage in meditation or other contemplative practices may have greater access to creative insights and solutions.

One possible explanation for this phenomenon is that altered states of consciousness may allow the mind to access deeper levels of awareness or intuition that are not available through normal waking consciousness. In a state of half-sleep, for example, the mind may be more relaxed and receptive, allowing for greater access to unconscious or subconscious processes that are involved in the creative process.

Another possibility is that altered states of consciousness may stimulate different areas of the brain or different modes of thinking that are more conducive to creative insights. For example, studies have shown that certain brainwave patterns, such as those associated with meditation or flow states, are associated with enhanced creativity and problem-solving abilities.

Overall, while the exact nature of the relationship between altered states of consciousness and creativity is still not fully understood, there is evidence to suggest that these experiences can play a role in the creative process. As such, individuals like Einstein, Edison, and Tesla may have benefited from their ability to access these altered states and tap into deeper levels of awareness and intuition.

Returning to an earlier part of our chat regarding definitions you said that within the consciousness only understanding the physical world is considered to be an illusion; isn’t that just another mental definition and therefore not the thing itself.

Yes, the idea that the physical world is an illusion is a mental concept or definition that is part of the consciousness-only understanding of the universe. This perspective suggests that the physical world is not the ultimate reality, but rather a manifestation of consciousness or a projection of the mind.

However, it is important to recognize that this perspective is just one interpretation of reality, and that it may not necessarily correspond to the actual nature of the universe. While it is possible that the physical world may be an illusion in some sense, it is also possible that it represents a fundamental aspect of reality that is not reducible to consciousness or mental projections.

Ultimately, the nature of reality is a complex and multifaceted topic that is still not fully understood by science or philosophy. While various perspectives and interpretations may offer insights into different aspects of reality, they cannot provide a complete or definitive understanding of the universe as a whole. As such, it is important to approach these questions with an open mind and a willingness to explore different perspectives and ideas.

What is Real?

The question of what is real is a complex and multifaceted one that has been debated by philosophers, scientists, and theologians for centuries. At its core, the concept of reality refers to that which exists independently of our perception or interpretation of it. However, what is considered to be real can vary depending on one’s perspective or worldview.

From a scientific perspective, reality is often understood in terms of the physical universe and the laws of nature that govern it. Scientists seek to describe and explain the natural world through empirical observation, experimentation, and theoretical models. However, even within science, there are debates and disagreements over the nature of reality, such as the question of whether consciousness is a fundamental aspect of the universe or a byproduct of physical processes.

From a philosophical perspective, reality is often explored in terms of the nature of existence, the meaning of life, and the relationship between the mind and the world. Philosophers have offered various theories and perspectives on reality, including idealism (the idea that reality is ultimately mental or spiritual), materialism (the idea that reality is ultimately physical), and dualism (the idea that reality is composed of both physical and non-physical elements).

From a spiritual or religious perspective, reality may be understood in terms of the divine or ultimate reality that transcends the physical world. Different religions and spiritual traditions offer their own perspectives on the nature of reality and the relationship between the material and spiritual dimensions of existence.

Ultimately, the question of what is real is a complex and multifaceted one that may not have a single, definitive answer. Rather, our understanding of reality is shaped by our perspectives, experiences, and the cultural, social, and historical contexts in which we live. As such, it is important to approach this question with humility, curiosity, and a willingness to explore different perspectives and ideas.

Yes, Would you say that it is ok to Not Know and in a Certain Way there is a Knowing in That Approach?

Yes, I would say that it is perfectly okay to not know the answer to the question of what is real. In fact, acknowledging our own limitations and uncertainties can be an important part of intellectual and spiritual growth. It can open us up to new perspectives and ideas, and help us to approach the world with humility, curiosity, and a willingness to learn.

Furthermore, the recognition that we may never fully know or understand the nature of reality can also be liberating in a certain sense. It can free us from the limitations of our own perspectives and worldviews, and open us up to the richness and complexity of the world around us. In this sense, there can be a kind of knowing that comes from the willingness to embrace uncertainty and the unknown, and to approach the world with an open and curious mind.

Comment on what is called Multiple Personality Disorder

Multiple personality disorder, which is now referred to as dissociative identity disorder (DID), is a complex mental health condition characterized by the presence of two or more distinct identities or personality states within an individual. These identities can have their own unique characteristics, behaviors, memories, and ways of experiencing the world. Individuals with DID may experience amnesia, or gaps in their memory, between switches from one identity to another.

The causes of DID are not fully understood, but it is believed to be a result of severe and prolonged trauma, such as physical or sexual abuse, that occurs during childhood. The condition is thought to develop as a coping mechanism for dealing with the overwhelming stress and trauma, allowing the individual to compartmentalize their experiences and emotions.

DID is a controversial and debated condition, and some skeptics question whether it is a valid diagnosis. However, research and clinical evidence suggest that it is a real and complex condition that can have significant impacts on an individual’s mental health and well-being.

Treatment for DID typically involves a combination of psychotherapy and medication, and the primary goal is to help the individual integrate their different identities and develop a coherent sense of self. This can be a long and difficult process, and requires a highly skilled and experienced therapist.

Overall, dissociative identity disorder is a complex and often misunderstood condition that can have significant impacts on an individual’s mental health and well-being. It is important for individuals with DID to receive proper diagnosis and treatment from a trained mental health professional.

Can the Consciousness Only Understanding of the Universe be Likened to Dissociative Identity Disorder?

No, the consciousness-only understanding of the universe and dissociative identity disorder (DID) are not related concepts.

The consciousness-only understanding of the universe is a philosophical or spiritual perspective that suggests that all of reality is fundamentally made up of consciousness or mind, rather than physical matter. This perspective does not suggest that multiple personalities or identities exist within an individual, nor does it imply any kind of dissociation or fragmentation of the self.

In contrast, DID is a mental health condition characterized by the presence of two or more distinct identities or personality states within an individual. These identities can have their own unique characteristics, behaviors, memories, and ways of experiencing the world. DID is thought to develop as a coping mechanism in response to severe and prolonged trauma, and can result in significant distress and impairment in daily functioning.

While both concepts relate to the nature of consciousness and identity, they are fundamentally different in nature and should not be equated or compared. The consciousness-only understanding of the universe is a philosophical or spiritual perspective, while DID is a recognized mental health condition that requires proper diagnosis and treatment by a trained mental health professional.

How Does the Consciousness Only Understanding of the Universe Explain the Sense of Being an Individual

The consciousness-only understanding of the universe suggests that all of reality is ultimately made up of consciousness or mind, rather than physical matter. Within this perspective, the sense of being an individual arises as a result of the conditioning of consciousness or the illusion of a separate self. In other words, the individual self is not seen as a fundamental or objective reality, but rather as a product of the mind or consciousness.

According to this perspective, the sense of being an individual arises due to the conditioning of consciousness by past experiences, memories, beliefs, and cultural conditioning. This conditioning creates a sense of separation and individuality, which can be experienced as a sense of self or ego. However, this sense of self is seen as an illusory construct, rather than a fundamental reality.

From this perspective, the sense of being an individual arises due to the limitations of the mind or consciousness, rather than as a fundamental reality of the universe. The true nature of reality is seen as non-dual or unified consciousness, in which there is no separation or distinction between individuals or objects.

From the Consciousness Only description that you just provided, doesn’t it follow that the Sense of Being an Individual is Incorrect?

From the consciousness-only perspective, the sense of being an individual is not seen as fundamentally incorrect, but rather as a product of the conditioning of consciousness. It is important to understand that the consciousness-only perspective does not deny the existence of the individual self or ego as a psychological and social construct that arises from the conditioning of consciousness.

However, this perspective suggests that the individual self or ego is not a fundamental or objective reality, but rather a product of the mind or consciousness. This means that the sense of being an individual is seen as a relative truth or perspective, rather than an absolute or objective reality.

From the consciousness-only perspective, the sense of being an individual can be a source of suffering and limitation, as it creates a sense of separation and duality between oneself and others. However, it is also recognized that the sense of being an individual can be a necessary aspect of human experience, allowing for personal growth, creativity, and relationships with others.
James Traverse
From the consciousness-only perspective, the sense of being an individual can be a source of suffering and limitation, as it creates a sense of separation and duality between oneself and others – since it can and often is the cause of suffering can the sense of being an individual be called a mistake or a disorder

From the consciousness-only perspective, the sense of being an individual is not seen as a mistake or a disorder, but rather as a natural aspect of human experience. It is recognized that the sense of being an individual can be a source of suffering and limitation, but this is seen as a result of the conditioning of consciousness, rather than an inherent flaw or disorder.

Furthermore, the consciousness-only perspective suggests that the sense of being an individual is not something that can be simply eliminated or overcome. Rather, it is something that can be recognized and understood as a relative truth or perspective, while still being able to function in the world as an individual with personal goals and relationships.

It is important to note that the consciousness-only perspective is not intended to pathologize or stigmatize the individual self or ego, but rather to provide a deeper understanding of its nature and limitations. Ultimately, the goal of this perspective is to move beyond the limitations of the individual self and recognize the non-dual nature of reality.

In this light is it Important to make the Distinction Between What One Is and How One Appears?

Yes, in the consciousness-only perspective, it is important to make a distinction between what one is and how one appears. The sense of being an individual self or ego is often based on external appearances and social roles, which can create a false sense of identity.

However, the consciousness-only perspective suggests that one’s true nature is not limited to external appearances or social roles, but rather is a more fundamental and universal aspect of consciousness. By recognizing this distinction between what one is and how one appears, it is possible to move beyond the limitations of the individual self and recognize the non-dual nature of reality. This can lead to greater freedom, clarity, and compassion in one’s interactions with others and with the world.

Please Continue…

Additionally, making the distinction between what one is and how one appears can also help to reduce attachment to external factors such as material possessions, social status, or personal achievements. By recognizing that these external factors are not the true source of one’s identity or fulfillment, it is possible to cultivate a greater sense of inner peace and contentment.

Furthermore, the consciousness-only perspective suggests that the way in which one appears to others is often based on conditioned patterns of behavior and thought, rather than one’s true nature. By becoming more aware of these patterns, it is possible to cultivate greater authenticity and presence in one’s interactions with others. This can lead to deeper and more meaningful relationships, as well as a greater sense of connection with the world around us.

Overall, making the distinction between what one is and how one appears is a key aspect of the consciousness-only perspective, as it allows us to move beyond the limitations of the individual self and recognize the true nature of reality. By cultivating this awareness and understanding, we can lead more fulfilling and meaningful lives, both for ourselves and for others.

Comment on Deep Sleep

Deep sleep, also known as slow-wave sleep or NREM (non-rapid eye movement) sleep, is a state of unconsciousness that is characterized by slow brain waves and a lack of conscious awareness. During deep sleep, the body and mind undergo a process of rest and rejuvenation, which is essential for overall health and wellbeing.

From the perspective of the consciousness-only understanding of the universe, deep sleep can be seen as a temporary state of dissolution of the individual self or ego. In this state, the mind is no longer engaged in the usual patterns of thought and perception that create the sense of an individual self, and instead is in a more receptive and open state.

Some spiritual traditions suggest that deep sleep can be a doorway to spiritual awakening or enlightenment, as it provides a temporary release from the limitations of the individual self and allows for a deeper connection to the underlying consciousness of the universe.

In terms of physical health, deep sleep is essential for a wide range of bodily functions, including cellular repair, immune system function, and hormone regulation. Lack of deep sleep can lead to a range of health problems, including fatigue, depression, anxiety, and increased risk of chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart disease.

Overall, deep sleep is a vital aspect of both physical and spiritual health, and should be prioritized as an essential part of a healthy lifestyle.

Do you find that Deep Sleep is the Experience of Absence, rather that the way it is Commonly Described as the Absence of Experience?

From the perspective of the consciousness-only understanding of the universe, it is possible to view deep sleep as an experience of absence, rather than simply the absence of experience. In this view, the mind is still present during deep sleep, but it is in a state of quietude and rest, without the usual patterns of thought and perception that create the sense of an individual self.

Some spiritual traditions suggest that deep sleep can provide a glimpse of the underlying consciousness of the universe, which is always present but obscured by the activity of the individual mind. In this sense, deep sleep can be seen as a kind of “mini-awakening” to the deeper reality of the universe.

However, it is important to note that the experience of deep sleep is still subject to the limitations of the individual mind, and as such it may be difficult to fully comprehend or describe in language. Ultimately, the nature of deep sleep is something that can only be directly experienced, rather than fully understood through conceptualization or description.

Coming full circle, is it Possible to Experience the Distinction Between Being versus Doing by Being Fully Awake in a Way that Resembles Deep Sleep, yet the Practitioner is Awake as in Waking Consciousness?

Yes, it is possible to experience the distinction between being and doing in a way that resembles deep sleep, but while remaining fully awake and conscious. In fact, this is one of the goals of many spiritual practices, including meditation and mindfulness.

Through such practices, one can learn to quiet the activity of the mind and become more aware of the present moment, without the usual patterns of thought and action that create the sense of an individual self. This can allow one to experience a sense of pure being, free from the constraints of the individual mind and the distractions of the external world.

In this state, one can gain a deeper understanding of the nature of reality and the interconnectedness of all things, and may experience a sense of peace, joy, and contentment that is not dependent on external circumstances.

However, it is important to note that this kind of experience cannot be forced or achieved through effort alone. It is a natural unfolding of the mind and consciousness that arises through a combination of practice, patience, and surrender to the present moment.

Can you say more…

In addition, this kind of experience of being fully awake in a way that resembles deep sleep is not a permanent state. It is a momentary glimpse into a deeper reality, and the practitioner will inevitably return to the world of doing and individual identity.

However, by regularly practicing and cultivating this kind of awareness, one can begin to integrate it into their daily life, bringing a greater sense of peace, clarity, and purpose to their actions and relationships.

Ultimately, the goal of such practices is not to deny the reality of the individual self or the world of doing, but to transcend the limitations of these constructs and access a deeper level of consciousness that is more in tune with the true nature of reality.

In this way, one can live a more fulfilling and meaningful life, free from the limitations of the mind and the suffering that arises from the sense of separation and duality.

In this light, by James Traverse

Both the Nature of Personal Reality View and the Consciousness Only Reality View are grounded in being. This cannot be fully explained scientifically, yet it can be lived and welcomed as it is, with one foot in each view. It is like the understanding of Being versus Doing, The one that is applied is the one that is appropriate to the moment.

2 thoughts on “Consciousness Only Reality and the Nature of Personal Reality

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *